How James Cameron wasted my time: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
James Cameron could be putting his formidable talents to use making films which startle us with their originality. | James Cameron could be putting his formidable talents to use making films which startle us with their originality. | ||
Instead he pours all his energies into tedious predictable | Instead he pours all his energies into tedious predictable dogma. | ||
Never mind that "Save the Earth" is a worthy goal. We've seen that movie, over and over, each reflecting its era, from "The Plow That Broke the Plains" (1936) to "On the Beach" (1959) to "Silent Running" (1972), "Soylent Greene" (1973), and "Logan's Run" (1976), through "Erin Brockovich" (2000), "An Inconvenient Truth" (2006), and "Beasts of the Southern Wild" (2012), to "A Perfect Planet" (2021). | Never mind that "Save the Earth" is a worthy goal. We've seen that movie, over and over, each reflecting its era, from "The Plow That Broke the Plains" (1936) to "On the Beach" (1959) to "Silent Running" (1972), "Soylent Greene" (1973), and "Logan's Run" (1976), through "Erin Brockovich" (2000), "An Inconvenient Truth" (2006), and "Beasts of the Southern Wild" (2012), to "A Perfect Planet" (2021). | ||
What does "Avatar" do that, say, "Snowpiercer" (2013) doesn't do? Other than leave a cloying scent of glycerin tears in my nostrils? | What does "Avatar" (2009) do that, say, "Snowpiercer" (2013) doesn't do? Other than leave a cloying scent of glycerin tears in my nostrils? | ||
And don't get me started on Avatar's "Pocahontas in Space" metaphor. Save that rant for another essay. | And don't get me started on Avatar's "Pocahontas in Space" metaphor. Save that rant for another essay. | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
== External links == | == External links == | ||
* [ | * [https://www.facebook.com/cluttergardella/posts/pfbid08PWoGeJ336mVJupy45b3zJtTzgdPXAihyop9oUF1gnQn3dPp8YMJjEA9zrwgPKmVl?comment_id=3348459465442761 Comment] @ Facebook (13 January 2023) | ||
[[Category:Fiction (nonfiction)]] | [[Category:Fiction (nonfiction)]] | ||
| Line 42: | Line 35: | ||
[[Category:James Cameron (nonfiction)]] | [[Category:James Cameron (nonfiction)]] | ||
[[Category: (nonfiction)]] | [[Category:Climate change (nonfiction)]] | ||
[[Category: (nonfiction)]] | [[Category:Ecology (nonfiction)]] | ||
[[Category: (nonfiction)]] | [[Category: (nonfiction)]] | ||
[[Category: (nonfiction)]] | [[Category: (nonfiction)]] | ||
Latest revision as of 06:52, 13 January 2023
James Cameron could be putting his formidable talents to use making films which startle us with their originality.
Instead he pours all his energies into tedious predictable dogma.
Never mind that "Save the Earth" is a worthy goal. We've seen that movie, over and over, each reflecting its era, from "The Plow That Broke the Plains" (1936) to "On the Beach" (1959) to "Silent Running" (1972), "Soylent Greene" (1973), and "Logan's Run" (1976), through "Erin Brockovich" (2000), "An Inconvenient Truth" (2006), and "Beasts of the Southern Wild" (2012), to "A Perfect Planet" (2021).
What does "Avatar" (2009) do that, say, "Snowpiercer" (2013) doesn't do? Other than leave a cloying scent of glycerin tears in my nostrils?
And don't get me started on Avatar's "Pocahontas in Space" metaphor. Save that rant for another essay.
Epilogue: Perhaps I should watch "Titanic" (1997). At the time of its release, turning up one's nose at such things was fashionable among my crowd. Or at least, turning up one's nose at young Leonardo DiCaprio was fashionable. But since then I have come to appreciate DiCaprio's talent (he was excellent in "Don't Look Up" (2021)).
In the News
Fiction cross-reference
Nonfiction cross-reference
External links
- Comment @ Facebook (13 January 2023)