No True Goldman: Difference between revisions

From Gnomon Chronicles
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:


<gallery>
<gallery>
File:A true accounting of wealth in America.jpg|link=A true accounting of wealth in America|'''[[A true accounting of wealth in America]]''' would reveal the multi-trillion-dollar business that is organized crime in America.
File:Wealth_-_Sunken_gold_bars_per_day.jpg|link=Wealth|[[Wealth|How many gold bars per day can a man publicly dump into the sea and yet have money left over to pay naval mercenaries to guard the site 24 by 7 by 365 so that no one ever raises that gold]]?
File:Wealth_-_Sunken_gold_bars_per_day.jpg|link=Wealth|[[Wealth|How many gold bars per day can a man publicly dump into the sea and yet have money left over to pay naval mercenaries to guard the site 24 by 7 by 365 so that no one ever raises that gold]]?
</gallery>
</gallery>

Revision as of 11:08, 21 June 2021

Earliest known poster referencing the No True Goldman fallacy.

"No True Goldman", or appeal to purity, is an informal fallacy in which one attempts to protect their universal generalization from a falsifying counterexample by excluding the counterexample improperly.

Discussion

Rather than abandoning the falsified universal generalization or providing evidence that would disqualify the falsifying counterexample, a slightly modified generalization is constructed ad-hoc to definitionally exclude the undesirable specific case and counterexamples like it by appeal to rhetoric.

This rhetoric takes the form of emotionally charged but nonsubstantive purity platitudes such as "true, pure, genuine, authentic, real", etc.

Relationship with No True Scotsman fallacy

See No true Scotsman at Wikipedia.

Source

Gnomon Chronicles School of Counter-Economics.

In the News

Fiction cross-reference

Nonfiction cross-reference

External links

  • Post @ Twitter (21 June 2021)