Perpetual motion and time machines: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
== Fiction cross reference == | == Fiction cross reference == | ||
* | * [[Perpetual motion machine]] | ||
* [[Time machine]] | |||
== Nonfiction cross reference == | == Nonfiction cross reference == |
Revision as of 14:38, 30 October 2015
Perpetual motion machines and time machines have one thing in common: Daddy Warbucks.
Consider:
- Perpetual Motion Machines are fictional.
- Daddy Warbucks is fictional.
- Daddy Warbucks would totally invest in a Perpetual Motion Machine.
- The photograph (TO_DO_PHOTO) clearly reveals a man who could possibly be Daddy Warbucks.
- Being fictional -- and this is critical -- Daddy Warbucks could appear anywhere.
And therefore:
- Perpetual Motion Machines are fictional -- just like Time Machines, which Daddy Warbucks would also totally invest in.
And it looks like Daddy Warbucks has invested in Time Machines -- why, just look at that youthful, vacant stare, hungering for a meaningful future ...!
Fiction cross reference
Nonfiction cross reference
External links
- Comment @ Boing Boing