Pachinko logic: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
The resulting nanobot swarm promptly consumed most of the [[Empyrées]] and their properties, while the [[Submarinards]] fled to their watery lairs. | The resulting nanobot swarm promptly consumed most of the [[Empyrées]] and their properties, while the [[Submarinards]] fled to their watery lairs. | ||
Eventually the swarm relaxed, and the [[French Revolution]] was able to proceed with [[ | Eventually the swarm relaxed, and the [[French Revolution]] was able to proceed with beheadings (see [[National Razor]]) and [[conscription (nonfiction)]]. | ||
== Tim Powers == | == Tim Powers == | ||
Pachinko logic may prove useful in [[Karl Jones (nonfiction)|my | Pachinko logic may prove useful in [[Karl Jones (nonfiction)|my]] dialog with [[Tim Powers]]. | ||
== Fiction cross-reference == | == Fiction cross-reference == | ||
Revision as of 04:41, 4 June 2016
Pachinko logic is logic (nonfiction) based on pachinko (nonfiction) machines.
It is currently (June 2016) manifested as a self-replicating swarm of nanobots, presumed intelligent and known to be irritable.
Debate
Pachinko logic has always been attended by debate, and in fact it emerged during the French Revolution after a heated debate between the Empyrées and the Submarinards.
The resulting nanobot swarm promptly consumed most of the Empyrées and their properties, while the Submarinards fled to their watery lairs.
Eventually the swarm relaxed, and the French Revolution was able to proceed with beheadings (see National Razor) and conscription (nonfiction).
Tim Powers
Pachinko logic may prove useful in my dialog with Tim Powers.