Pachinko logic: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Debate) |
(→Debate) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
The resulting nanobot swarm promptly consumed the [[Empyrées]] and all their properties, while the [[Submarinards]] retreated to their watery lairs to wait out the crisis. | The resulting nanobot swarm promptly consumed the [[Empyrées]] and all their properties, while the [[Submarinards]] retreated to their watery lairs to wait out the crisis. | ||
Eventually the swarm relaxed, and the [[French Revolution]] was able to proceed with [[beheadings (nonfiction)]] and [[conscription (nonfiction)]]. But it was touch and go, | Eventually the swarm relaxed, and the [[French Revolution]] was able to proceed with [[beheadings (nonfiction)]] and [[conscription (nonfiction)]]. But it was touch and go there, for a while -- touch and go. | ||
== Fiction cross-reference == | == Fiction cross-reference == |
Revision as of 12:52, 16 March 2016
Pachinko logic is logic (nonfiction) based on pachinko (nonfiction) machines.
It is currently (March 2016) manifested as a self-replicating swarm of nanobots, presumed intelligent and known to be irritable.
Debate
Pachinko logic has always been attended by debate, and in fact it emerged during the French Revolution after a heated debate between the Empyrées and the Submarinards.
The resulting nanobot swarm promptly consumed the Empyrées and all their properties, while the Submarinards retreated to their watery lairs to wait out the crisis.
Eventually the swarm relaxed, and the French Revolution was able to proceed with beheadings (nonfiction) and conscription (nonfiction). But it was touch and go there, for a while -- touch and go.